Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Just Some Fun Stuff!

Portland People! Tonight - Opening of "B-SIDES" exhibit at the fun-destination Ampersand.  Sure to be the hip happenin' place to be this evening and hello, what an amazing roster of work! If you live within a hundred mile radius of Portland, make the trip to see it. You have a month to do so!



Down the West Coast from us, in San Francisco, just opened: the conceptually cool  "NOT KANSAS: Photographers Explore Their Own Worlds" exhibit at Rayko Photo.  Gallery director Ann Jastrab let us know that a good percentage of the exhibiting photographers were Photolucida finds: Tami Bone, Alison Carey, Chris Colville, Jeremy Dyer, and Curtis Wehrfritz.

Photo: Jeremy Dyer


And, Yan Li of High Noon Culture in China, has let us know that the following eight photographers - most found through our programming - were selected to exhibit their portfolios at the 2012 Shanghai International Art Show: Traer Schott, Norihisa Hosaka, Gabriela Herman, Bryan David Griffith, Joseph Holmes, Tami Bone, Andrew Buurman, Jacqueline Walters, and Michael Kirchoff.  And, Camille Seaman and Hollis Bennett will be traveling to Beijing on August 2nd, where they will travel to the Panjin region to work their photography assignment! 

Photo: Traer Scott

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Critical Mass pre-screening thoughts from Joni Kabana:

 

And they are off! The Critical Mass pre-screeners are out of the gate and we have one juror already formulating some thoughts on the process...

 

Joni Kabana, photographer, educator, consultant, and Photolucida board member extraordinaire posted some thoughts on her blog today, which we will share here:
 
In the last several years, I have been asked to perform portfolios reviews, consult one-on-one with individual photographers, and judge various photography competitions. In each case, I feel honored to provide this service.


And while I try to make some adjustments for each situation, I can’t help but uphold a standard of criteria when I look at photographic work. Sometimes this upsets people greatly, and they defend their work ferociously, even within an entry level photography classroom. This is fine. Others express gratitude for an honest assessment and helping them move into another phase of the development of their work.

I don’t pretend to know everything about photography. I am only one person, with one opinion. However, there are several themes that do seem apparent to me:  Photography has no rules, never tells the entire truth, is bastardized frequently, and love is in the eye of the beholder. I have seen weak work garner stellar awards, and strong work pushed aside.

The truth seems to be that there is more to the picture than the picture.

This month, I am in the process of pre-screening 755 of this year’s Critical Mass entries. Each entry includes ten images and an artist’s statement.  I am halfway finished, and after viewing 387 entries, I am starting to see a pattern regarding how I “judged” the entries. And often, very often, I wish that the artist is sitting right here next to me so I could ask them some questions.

Here are some of those questions. I hope this helps when editing your entries for any competition. As I reflect upon these questions, I realize many things about my own work and how I can alter my approach.

What were you thinking when you came up with this concept? Did you clearly state this in your artist statement?

If you’ve seen it before, are these images similar?

Does your work look strikingly like (blatantly derivative of) someone else’s work that you admire?

What are you really trying to tell your audience?

Do all photos form a song?

Do any of the images feel insincere?

Who is more prominently in focus: your content or your self?

How are these photos surprising?

Is your artist statement descriptive, and not overbearing or self-righteous?

How is your point of view different from others we have seen?

Did you take risks with the subject matter, execution of imagery, post processing?

Does one weak image take the others down?

Even though you captured important subject matter (cancer, crime, death), are the images interesting and different?

Have you gone too far just to be considered “different”?

Is the group of images cohesive?

Is the group of images repetitive?

Have you told anyone to blankly stare into the lens?

Are you trying too hard to solicit emotions from the viewer?

Were you engaged with your subject matter? How so?

Are you trying to please someone?

Have you taken a photo of a photo (or painting, or design) and if so, how have you made this your own image?

Do the images tell us something without having to read the artist statement?

Again, there are no right and wrong answers when creating a body of photographic work. It is yours, and should reflect your voice. But if we present the portfolio to others, especially within a competition, there seems to be another layer of pondering that might be useful in presenting something that is unique and therefore more aptly noticed.

Sunday, July 15, 2012

THE CLOCK IS TICKING! 24 HOUR EXTENSION!

 

There is now a 24 hour submission extension for Critical Mass! Registration closes tomorrow (Tuesday) at 12 noon (Pacific Daylight Time!)


Have you completed your submission? Good job!

Have you registered but have yet to submit your images? Get to it!

Are you still thinking about submitting but teeter on the edge of indecision? You have until the deadline Tuesday! But not a second later. There are no extensions to the extension. 


Are you curious as to what is next?

We proof all the Critical Mass entries, make sure everything is looking as it should, and format them for our panel of 26 pre-screeners. This year we have these great folks looking at all the submissions and jurying for the finalist group:

Alexa Becker, Kehrer Verlag
Darren Ching,  Klompching Gallery & Photo District News
Jennifer DeCarlo, jdc Fine Art
Julia Dolan, Portland Art Museum
Roy Flukinger, Harry Ransom Center
Hamidah Glasgow, The Center for Fine Art Photography
Fabian Goncalves Borrega, Art Museum of the Americas
Cherie Hiser, Educator/Curator
Laura Valenti Jelen, Newspace Center for Photography
Rupert Jenkins, Colorado Photographic Arts Center
Joni Kabana, Photolucida board
Dennis Kiel, The Light Factory
Stu Levy, Photolucida board & Portland Art Museum Photo Council
Yan Li, Beijing High Noon Culture
Mary McClean, Random House
Blue Mitchell, Diffusion Magazine
Laura Moya, Photolucida 
Claire Annette Mussard, Independent Curator
Sharon Lavier O'Keefe, Northwest Center for Photography
Madeline Yale Preston, Independent Curator
Shawn Records, Photolucida board
Mary Anne Redding, Santa Fe University of Art & Design
George Slade, re: photographica
Christina Spielvogel, Blue Sky Exhibition Committee
Barbara Tannenbaum, Cleveland Museum of Art
Paula Tognarelli, Griffin Museum for Photography

And the Critical Mass Finalist list will be announced around August 27th!

.

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Photography Competitions, Critical Mass, and...Money!



Every year during Critical Mass registration, the topic of entry fees pops up – and we often see the query, “Why is Critical Mass so expensive?” 


Let’s back up, put on our thinking caps and look at photography competitions in general, and then specifically, Critical Mass. I will make this all-important note here, just because we often feel like yelling it from the rooftops: Critical Mass is not just a competition! Even though there is jurying involved, it is a multi-layered program about EXPOSURE that has awards as well. It is a long-established, community-based program, and not a "photo contest". Read on and you will see why our submission fees reflect this.


Cut to the big picture: It seems that more and more photography competitions are popping up left and right, and unfortunately it is left to the photographer to investigate which fall in the “legitimate” “semi-legitimate” and the “genuine scam” categories. Add this to your list of things you have to do on top of just making your work.


AS YOU NAVIGATE YOUR "COMPETITION" OPTIONS, HERE ARE SOME COMMON-SENSE QUESTIONS TO ASK:

1. Is the photo competition being produced by a non-profit organization or a for-profit business?

(We are not saying legitimate competitions are not held by for-profit businesses, but it helps if they exist on a non-virtual level, such as being a mortar-and-brick gallery. Also, please note that "photography competitions" fall under a different category than "juried exhibitions with submission fees".)

2. Does the organizer have a website built solely for information about the contest? Or, is it part of a larger website where you can get information about the umbrella organization? Is there evidence as to how long the organization has existed?

(Non-profits are required to list their staff and board of directors on their website. They make it easy for the general public to contact then. Often, less-than-legitimate competitions will make it hard for you to get in touch with them, perhaps just giving a generic e-mail address, with no real names involved.)

3. Other things to question:  Does the competition organizer announce winners after the deadline? How many jury members are there? What makes them qualified? Can one link the jurors to respected institutions?

(Reputable competitions announce their jury members, prizes, timelines, etc. Final results/material should make it out into the public domain in a clear, timely and useful manner.)


4. As with anything, read the fine print! Don't skim over this.


(There are a number of organizations that are promoting contests as a way to collect imagery to use in various ways, with no compensation to you - and you end up having no say. Don't sign away the rights to your imagery.)

And, as a related topic (hopefully it's own blog post at some point) - now currently on everyone’s radar: Organizations (businesses and non-profits) who are using Kickstarter to fund programming. Which people have mixed feelings about, thus producing a pressure for these organizations to show some accountability for how funds raised during their campaign have been spent.

So – we are looking at both “transparency” and “accountability” as key words here.


NOW, WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH CRITICAL MASS?

Every year, as photographers weigh the pros and cons of entering Critical Mass, the question of money comes up. Critical Mass has a two-tiered entry fee - $75 US ($90 International) to enter and $200 if you make the Finalist round. Yes, this might initially seem like a lot of money compared to other “competitions” out there, but please pause to consider the total workings of Critical Mass – there is a lot to absorb! So, stick with us here, and read on.


QUESTION:  HEY - WHAT DOES PHOTOLUCIDA DO WITH ALL THOSE SUBMISSION FEES?

Established 12 years ago, Photolucida is a 501c3 non-profit. We are required to show that all of the income the organization takes in is used to further our mission. We show on our tax return what the Critical Mass income goes toward, and have established transparency on this topic to the public.

For details on where the registration income goes, AND many more interesting facts about Critical Mass, including a cost/benefit analysis, please look at our FAQ page. We have taken the time to spell it out for you here.

Photolucida has annually addressed the Critical Mass money question on our blog in the past: 

And, we were pleased when Joerg Colberg picked up on our 2011 post and used Photolucida's example as a call for industry transparency in his Conscientious blog.

This is a topic that is on a lot of people's minds.

You may not know that Photolucida gives back as well as takes in. In addition to the Critical Mass awards and the DVDs and monographs sent out to entrants and jurors, we do some behind-the-scenes things that are pretty neat:

Photolucida gives Critical Mass scholarships to “foreign” photographers from countries that might be under-represented in mainstream awareness of emerging photography and/or truly unable to pay submission fees. Photolucida also gives scholarships to our Portfolio Reviews event to deserving photographers as part of the Critical Mass programming. We also have a Library Program where we send each year’s Critical Mass publications to over 30 Oregon art school, college, university and public libraries. And, we send the finalist DVDs to educators who request them, as it is a great teaching tool in photography classes.


QUESTION: OK, ALL THIS SOUNDS GREAT, BUT HOW DO I KNOW I GET MY MONEY'S WORTH IF I SUBMIT TO CRITICAL MASS?


Let’s establish the premise that you are a photographer falling somewhere in the wide scope of emerging photography – and you want people to see your work. Realistically, there needs to be some kind of “marketing” line item for you as a photographer where you do have to spend time and money to promote your work. You need to decide how best to get your work out there in the most efficient way possible to people who may be able to offer opportunities. You can spend your “marketing dollar" on a multitude of things: a new website, business cards, leave-behind materials, Portfolio Reviews…you need to decide what makes sense for you at this point in your career and what your finances can accommodate. Critical Mass is just one of your options.

So, after reading all of this, if you feel like you have a solid portfolio of ten images, a sincere artist statement, and feel excited to get the work out in the world, now might be the time to submit to Critical Mass.

We don’t promise instant success – you should be wise enough to know the art world does not work like that. But we do know that exposure through submission to Critical Mass produces results…because we hear success stories from people all the time.


Usually, the most dramatic feedback from our book award winners:

'Winning the Critical Mass book award has really changed my life. It has exposed my work to so many people, and over the past couple years I've been lucky enough to work with some of them.

David Bram of Fraction Magazine first saw my work as a juror, which then led to a feature on Fraction and that led to gallery representation with Jennifer Schwartz Gallery. Since then I have had my work featured in PDN, Flak Photo, and One One Thousand. I’ve shot assignments for The New York Times and Oxford American Magazine. Not only has my work been exposed to over 200 jurors in the photo world, but it is still being seen in a new and more final way through the publication of the monograph.

I can’t express in words how thrilling it has been to work on the monograph and share it with so many people in the photo community.'

— Jeff Rich


And stories that are more subtle, but meaningful just the same:

'I believe the exposure helped to keep my work on the minds of some influential folks who were on the selection committee at the Griffin Museum of Photography.  This helped lead to my first solo show there.'       

—  Corey Hendrickson


Even if you don’t make it into the finalist group, you still have some substantial benefits: you receive the DVD with all submissions included (so your work goes out to all the photographers who submitted as well) and you receive a copy of the book award winner’s monograph once published. And, you have had the experience of submitting if this process is new to you, and 26 pre-screening jurors will have seen your work.

'I have to say that the entry fee is worth it for me. It might seem a little bit steep as compared to other opportunities (which typically "average" about $35 for 3 entries) but Critical Mass is a bit different. For starters, we can enter 10 images, not just 3. Also, we get the CD containing all of the work that was entered. Most juried shows do not offer this and I've found it to be great insight into what others are doing in the field. Finally, we get the great books at the end of the process. Have you priced any photo books lately? Hint: you can't get them (even a Blurb book) for under the price. 

When you combine all of these factors, Critical Mass is a bargain and that's before you release the Top 50 list.'

—  Carol Schiraldi


One more note… (and thanks for reading though this essay of a blog post!) The biggest vote of confidence we could ever ask for comes from our truly outstanding group of jurors that have chosen to give their time to us. Some have asked us if they could jury, and some have been jurying for us going on nine years. Many of these industry greats have said, “I would love to jury! I believe in what you do.” 


Saturday, July 7, 2012

Some Frosting on the Critical Mass Cake

 

As part of Critical Mass this year, Photolucida is happy to give three "golden tickets"* to our popular biennial Portfolio Reviews event to three finalists in this year's Critical Mass!

 

Our next Portfolio Review event is April 18th-20th, 2013 during Portland Photo Month. Traditionally, registration for this event fills up in a blink of an eye (last time, 160 spots were filled in 20 minutes)...and we are reserving three spots pulled from the Critical Mass finalist group. Three names will be randomly drawn - it is our thought that if your work is strong enough to be in the finalist group, you are ready to attend the Reviews.

The Portfolio Reviews event is an exciting four days - one meets with 18 top-notch Reviewers to receive feedback on one's work, establish relationships and make connections that possibly lead to opportunities.  Lectures, lunchtime chats, social events and city-wide photography exhibitions are part of the event. (note: all links above are for the 2011 event)

Past "golden ticket" scholarship recipients include Robert Knight, Christopher Churchill, Rachel Barrett, Michael Tummings, Noelle Swan Gilbert, Alexis Pike, M. Bruce Hall, and Sika Stanton.

Yet another reason to enter Critical Mass!


* borrowed terminology coined from Roald Dahl's great "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" and first used in this context by Noelle Swan Gilbert.


Reviewer downtime - © Harris Fogel
Natalie Young - © Tom Hubbard
Tony Bannon at Portland Art Museum - © Tom Hubbard
Portfolio Walk at Portland Art Museum - © Daniel Cronin


Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Two past Critical Mass photographers going to China!

 

As a postscript to the earlier call for entries for the project in China, Yan Li has let us know that Camille Seaman and Hollis Bennett were chosen. 


Camille Seaman was one of our Critical Mass 2006 book award winners, and Hollis Bennett was a Critical Mass finalist in 2011. We hope these two travelers have a grand adventure in China.

I am going to take this opportunity to trot out a past testimonial from Camille Seaman, because it is one of my favorite, and it speaks clearly about the "tipping point" that Critical Mass has the potential to provide:

I am not exaggerating or being dramatic by saying that Critical Mass changed my life, for it is very true that you can make the best images in the world but they mean nothing if all they see is the inside of a box. Critical Mass has been just that for me, that tipping point that has made so much more possible, like some video game I have found the gold key and may now advance to the next level!


Because of Critical Mass, JD Talesek found me, and told 'American Photo' about me via Brian Clamp and since then I have had magazines from all over Europe and the US including ' Outside', 'Focus Magazine', and 'Men’s Journal' publish my work. I even got a call from 'Time' magazine. I have made many print sales through my galleries. I will be speaking at PCNW on Feb 1st and my big shindig at the National Academy of Sciences will be on March 2nd. Not too shabby, huh?


— Camille Seaman



© Camille Seaman: From 'The Last Iceberg' series
© Hollis Bennett: From 'American Weekend' series

Sunday, July 1, 2012

Kehrer Verlag co-publishing Critical Mass book award publication!

 

Photolucida is over-the-moon excited that our Critical Mass 2012 book award publication will be produced in collaboration with exemplary publishers Kehrer Verlag!


 


Kehrer Verlag's Fall Catalog

Those savvy to the world of photography book publication know that Kehrer Verlag, based in Heidelberg, Germany, leads the field in innovative production and design of fine art and photography books. Working closely with international photographers, museums and cultural institutions, Kehrer Verlag creates its monographs in alliance with Kehrer Design, the affiliated design agency.

Photographers who have attended international and national Portfolio Reviews and book fairs have most likely encountered Kehrer Verlag's engaging and tireless advocate Alexa Becker, who is on the Critical Mass pre-screening committee this year.

Kehrer books have a strong and wide-spread distribution map with includes most European countries, the United States, Canada and Asia. One can browse through Kehrer's most recent catalog here!

So, the book award winner this year will not only join the roster of previous Critical Mass book award recipients (Photolucida will send a copy of the published monograph to all the jurors who juried Critical Mass and all the photographers who entered) but have their monograph designed and distributed by Kehrer Verlag internationally.

Pretty sweet, yes?


.